↓ Skip to main content

Saline versus balanced solutions: are clinical trials comparing two crystalloid solutions really needed?

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
85 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Saline versus balanced solutions: are clinical trials comparing two crystalloid solutions really needed?
Published in
Critical Care, August 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13054-016-1435-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jean-Louis Vincent, Daniel De Backer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 85 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 3%
South Africa 1 3%
Unknown 36 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Professor 2 5%
Other 10 26%
Unknown 8 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 71%
Unspecified 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Unknown 9 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2022.
All research outputs
#729,352
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#517
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,346
of 369,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#27
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,338 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.