You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A verified genomic reference sample for assessing performance of cancer panels detecting small variants of low allele frequency
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13059-021-02316-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wendell Jones, Binsheng Gong, Natalia Novoradovskaya, Dan Li, Rebecca Kusko, Todd A. Richmond, Donald J. Johann, Halil Bisgin, Sayed Mohammad Ebrahim Sahraeian, Pierre R. Bushel, Mehdi Pirooznia, Katherine Wilkins, Marco Chierici, Wenjun Bao, Lee Scott Basehore, Anne Bergstrom Lucas, Daniel Burgess, Daniel J. Butler, Simon Cawley, Chia-Jung Chang, Guangchun Chen, Tao Chen, Yun-Ching Chen, Daniel J. Craig, Angela del Pozo, Jonathan Foox, Margherita Francescatto, Yutao Fu, Cesare Furlanello, Kristina Giorda, Kira P. Grist, Meijian Guan, Yingyi Hao, Scott Happe, Gunjan Hariani, Nathan Haseley, Jeff Jasper, Giuseppe Jurman, David Philip Kreil, Paweł Łabaj, Kevin Lai, Jianying Li, Quan-Zhen Li, Yulong Li, Zhiguang Li, Zhichao Liu, Mario Solís López, Kelci Miclaus, Raymond Miller, Vinay K. Mittal, Marghoob Mohiyuddin, Carlos Pabón-Peña, Barbara L. Parsons, Fujun Qiu, Andreas Scherer, Tieliu Shi, Suzy Stiegelmeyer, Chen Suo, Nikola Tom, Dong Wang, Zhining Wen, Leihong Wu, Wenzhong Xiao, Chang Xu, Ying Yu, Jiyang Zhang, Yifan Zhang, Zhihong Zhang, Yuanting Zheng, Christopher E. Mason, James C. Willey, Weida Tong, Leming Shi, Joshua Xu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 50% |
| Norway | 1 | 7% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 7% |
| Ireland | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 9 | 64% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 36% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 36% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 17 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 34% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 17 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2021.
All research outputs
#596,626
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#355
of 4,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,656
of 441,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#6
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.