↓ Skip to main content

Reduction of late stillbirth with the introduction of fetal movement information and guidelines – a clinical quality improvement

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
126 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reduction of late stillbirth with the introduction of fetal movement information and guidelines – a clinical quality improvement
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, July 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-9-32
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julie Victoria Holm Tveit, Eli Saastad, Babill Stray-Pedersen, Per E Børdahl, Vicki Flenady, Ruth Fretts, J Frederik Frøen

Abstract

Women experiencing decreased fetal movements (DFM) are at increased risk of adverse outcomes, including stillbirth. Fourteen delivery units in Norway registered all cases of DFM in a population-based quality assessment. We found that information to women and management of DFM varied significantly between hospitals. We intended to examine two cohorts of women with DFM before and during two consensus-based interventions aiming to improve care through: 1) written information to women about fetal activity and DFM, including an invitation to monitor fetal movements, 2) guidelines for management of DFM for health-care professionals.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 93 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 17%
Student > Master 16 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Other 19 20%
Unknown 13 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 17%
Engineering 6 6%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 14 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2018.
All research outputs
#704,658
of 15,922,891 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#147
of 2,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,519
of 154,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#4
of 150 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,922,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,927 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 150 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.