↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: Sex and Gender Equity in Research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use

Overview of attention for article published in Research Integrity and Peer Review, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum to: Sex and Gender Equity in Research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use
Published in
Research Integrity and Peer Review, June 2016
DOI 10.1186/s41073-016-0016-5
Authors

Shirin Heidari, Thomas F. Babor, Paola De Castro, Sera Tort, Mirjam Curno

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 33%
Unknown 2 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2023.
All research outputs
#7,145,671
of 25,369,304 outputs
Outputs from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#125
of 133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,652
of 368,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,369,304 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 133 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 74.8. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.