You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A review of statistical methods for dietary pattern analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12937-021-00692-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Junkang Zhao, Zhiyao Li, Qian Gao, Haifeng Zhao, Shuting Chen, Lun Huang, Wenjie Wang, Tong Wang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 33% |
| Sweden | 1 | 17% |
| Belgium | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 238 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 9% |
| Researcher | 14 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 27 | 11% |
| Unknown | 104 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 39 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 30 | 13% |
| Unknown | 113 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,831,306
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#459
of 1,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,787
of 455,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#3
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.