↓ Skip to main content

Passive acoustic monitoring reveals group ranging and territory use: a case study of wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Zoology, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
8 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Passive acoustic monitoring reveals group ranging and territory use: a case study of wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)
Published in
Frontiers in Zoology, August 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12983-016-0167-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ammie K. Kalan, Alex K. Piel, Roger Mundry, Roman M. Wittig, Christophe Boesch, Hjalmar S. Kühl

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Puerto Rico 1 <1%
Unknown 139 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 20%
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 25 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 65 45%
Environmental Science 27 19%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Psychology 3 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 2%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 29 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2018.
All research outputs
#1,113,012
of 17,361,274 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Zoology
#71
of 562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,150
of 272,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Zoology
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,361,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 562 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,137 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them