You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genetic and non-genetic factors affecting the expression of COVID-19-relevant genes in the large airway epithelium
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Medicine, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13073-021-00866-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Silva Kasela, Victor E. Ortega, Molly Martorella, Suresh Garudadri, Jenna Nguyen, Elizabeth Ampleford, Anu Pasanen, Srilaxmi Nerella, Kristina L. Buschur, Igor Z. Barjaktarevic, R. Graham Barr, Eugene R. Bleecker, Russell P. Bowler, Alejandro P. Comellas, Christopher B. Cooper, David J. Couper, Gerard J. Criner, Jeffrey L. Curtis, MeiLan K. Han, Nadia N. Hansel, Eric A. Hoffman, Robert J. Kaner, Jerry A. Krishnan, Fernando J. Martinez, Merry-Lynn N. McDonald, Deborah A. Meyers, Robert Paine, Stephen P. Peters, Mario Castro, Loren C. Denlinger, Serpil C. Erzurum, John V. Fahy, Elliot Israel, Nizar N. Jarjour, Bruce D. Levy, Xingnan Li, Wendy C. Moore, Sally E. Wenzel, Joe Zein, Charles Langelier, Prescott G. Woodruff, Tuuli Lappalainen, Stephanie A. Christenson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 35% |
| Spain | 4 | 13% |
| Finland | 2 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 55% |
| Scientists | 13 | 42% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 111 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
| Researcher | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 38 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 14% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 41 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,568,320
of 25,391,701 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#337
of 1,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,554
of 452,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#15
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,391,701 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,587 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.