You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Guidelines on the diagnosis, clinical assessments, treatment and management for CLN2 disease patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13023-021-01813-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sara E. Mole, Angela Schulz, Eben Badoe, Samuel F. Berkovic, Emily C. de Los Reyes, Simon Dulz, Paul Gissen, Norberto Guelbert, Charles M. Lourenco, Heather L. Mason, Jonathan W. Mink, Noreen Murphy, Miriam Nickel, Joffre E. Olaya, Maurizio Scarpa, Ingrid E. Scheffer, Alessandro Simonati, Nicola Specchio, Ina Von Löbbecke, Raymond Y. Wang, Ruth E. Williams |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 40% |
| United States | 4 | 27% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| France | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 47% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 111 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 7% |
| Researcher | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 19% |
| Unknown | 47 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 6% |
| Psychology | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 47 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,613,929
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#177
of 3,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,336
of 456,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#9
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,175 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,037 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.