You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of comprehensive geriatric care models on postoperative outcomes in geriatric surgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Anesthesiology, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12871-021-01337-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aparna Saripella, Sara Wasef, Mahesh Nagappa, Sheila Riazi, Marina Englesakis, Jean Wong, Frances Chung |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 58% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
| Scientists | 3 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 36 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 36 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2022.
All research outputs
#4,147,646
of 23,642,687 outputs
Outputs from BMC Anesthesiology
#145
of 1,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,896
of 436,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Anesthesiology
#5
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,642,687 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,565 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.