You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Optimizing language for effective communication of gene therapy concepts with hemophilia patients: a qualitative study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13023-020-01555-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel P. Hart, Brian R. Branchford, Sarah Hendry, Robert Ledniczky, Robert F. Sidonio, Claude Négrier, Michelle Kim, Michelle Rice, Matthew Minshall, Claire Arcé, Steve Prince, Maria Kelleher, Sharon Lee |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Curaçao | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Professor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 59% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 3 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 17 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2021.
All research outputs
#15,853,964
of 23,556,846 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#1,857
of 2,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#261,584
of 438,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#57
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,556,846 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.