↓ Skip to main content

Colonoscopy in poorly prepped colons: a cost effectiveness analysis comparing standard of care to a new cleansing technology

Overview of attention for article published in Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 380)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Colonoscopy in poorly prepped colons: a cost effectiveness analysis comparing standard of care to a new cleansing technology
Published in
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, April 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12962-021-00277-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Voigt, Jeffrey, Mosier, Michael, Gralnek, Ian M.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 2 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Researcher 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 18%
Arts and Humanities 1 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 9%
Decision Sciences 1 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 45%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 81. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2021.
All research outputs
#351,327
of 19,272,587 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#3
of 380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,552
of 332,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,272,587 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 380 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them