You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Maize-IAS: a maize image analysis software using deep learning for high-throughput plant phenotyping
|
---|---|
Published in |
Plant Methods, April 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13007-021-00747-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Shuo Zhou, Xiujuan Chai, Zixuan Yang, Hongwu Wang, Chenxue Yang, Tan Sun |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 25% |
Brazil | 1 | 25% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 14% |
Lecturer | 3 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Unknown | 21 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 7 | 17% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 14% |
Engineering | 3 | 7% |
Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 20 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2021.
All research outputs
#14,692,172
of 24,132,754 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#702
of 1,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,129
of 430,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#15
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,132,754 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.