You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
What evidence exists on the impact of specific ecosystem components and functions on infectious diseases? A systematic map
|
---|---|
Published in |
Environmental Evidence, April 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13750-021-00220-4 |
Authors |
Léa Lugassy, Ludivine Amdouni-Boursier, Haoues Alout, Romuald Berrebi, Christophe Boëte, Franck Boué, Nathalie Boulanger, Thierry Durand, Michel de Garine-Wichatitsky, Sylvain Larrat, Marie Moinet, Catherine Moulia, Nonito Pagès, Olivier Plantard, Vincent Robert, Barbara Livoreil |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
New Zealand | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 12% |
Researcher | 5 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
Other | 12 | 20% |
Unknown | 24 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 14% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 5 | 8% |
Environmental Science | 5 | 8% |
Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 3% |
Other | 11 | 19% |
Unknown | 25 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2021.
All research outputs
#14,458,727
of 24,265,140 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#275
of 315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,225
of 430,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#6
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,265,140 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.