↓ Skip to main content

What evidence exists on the impact of specific ecosystem components and functions on infectious diseases? A systematic map

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What evidence exists on the impact of specific ecosystem components and functions on infectious diseases? A systematic map
Published in
Environmental Evidence, April 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13750-021-00220-4
Authors

Lugassy, Léa, Amdouni-Boursier, Ludivine, Alout, Haoues, Berrebi, Romuald, Boëte, Christophe, Boué, Franck, Boulanger, Nathalie, Durand, Thierry, de Garine-Wichatitsky, Michel, Larrat, Sylvain, Moinet, Marie, Moulia, Catherine, Pagès, Nonito, Plantard, Olivier, Robert, Vincent, Livoreil, Barbara

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 8 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 22%
Environmental Science 4 13%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 10 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2021.
All research outputs
#11,745,158
of 21,053,465 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#223
of 279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,615
of 336,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,053,465 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them