You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Epigenome-wide association study of kidney function identifies trans-ethnic and ethnic-specific loci
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Medicine, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13073-021-00877-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charles E. Breeze, Anna Batorsky, Mi Kyeong Lee, Mindy D. Szeto, Xiaoguang Xu, Daniel L. McCartney, Rong Jiang, Amit Patki, Holly J. Kramer, James M. Eales, Laura Raffield, Leslie Lange, Ethan Lange, Peter Durda, Yongmei Liu, Russ P. Tracy, David Van Den Berg, Kathryn L. Evans, William E. Kraus, Svati Shah, Hermant K. Tiwari, Lifang Hou, Eric A. Whitsel, Xiao Jiang, Fadi J. Charchar, Andrea A. Baccarelli, Stephen S. Rich, Andrew P. Morris, Marguerite R. Irvin, Donna K. Arnett, Elizabeth R. Hauser, Jerome I. Rotter, Adolfo Correa, Caroline Hayward, Steve Horvath, Riccardo E. Marioni, Maciej Tomaszewski, Stephan Beck, Sonja I. Berndt, Stephanie J. London, Josyf C. Mychaleckyj, Nora Franceschini |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 10% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 8% |
| Spain | 2 | 5% |
| Uganda | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Qatar | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 18 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 59% |
| Scientists | 14 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 30% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 6 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 15% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 22% |
| Unknown | 8 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,249,148
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#253
of 1,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,486
of 453,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#6
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,586 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.