You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impact of feature selection methods and subgroup factors on prognostic analysis with CT-based radiomics in non-small cell lung cancer patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Radiation Oncology, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13014-021-01810-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yuto Sugai, Noriyuki Kadoya, Shohei Tanaka, Shunpei Tanabe, Mariko Umeda, Takaya Yamamoto, Kazuya Takeda, Suguru Dobashi, Haruna Ohashi, Ken Takeda, Keiichi Jingu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 23% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 6 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 19% |
| Engineering | 2 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2021.
All research outputs
#14,554,120
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#819
of 2,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,417
of 437,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#13
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,092 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.