↓ Skip to main content

Explaining variance in perceived research misbehavior: results from a survey among academic researchers in Amsterdam

Overview of attention for article published in Research Integrity and Peer Review, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
25 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Explaining variance in perceived research misbehavior: results from a survey among academic researchers in Amsterdam
Published in
Research Integrity and Peer Review, May 2021
DOI 10.1186/s41073-021-00110-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tamarinde Haven, Joeri Tijdink, Brian Martinson, Lex Bouter, Frans Oort

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 2 25%
Arts and Humanities 1 13%
Environmental Science 1 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,880,817
of 25,541,640 outputs
Outputs from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#80
of 133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,690
of 454,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,541,640 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 133 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 76.8. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.