You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mediators of the effect of the JUMP-in intervention on physical activity and sedentary behavior in Dutch primary schoolchildren from disadvantaged neighborhoods
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1479-5868-9-131 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maartje M van Stralen, Judith de Meij, Saskia J te Velde, Marcel F van der Wal, Willem van Mechelen, Dirk L Knol, Mai JM Chinapaw |
| Abstract |
Important health benefits can be achieved when physical activity in children from low socio-economic status is promoted and sedentariness is limited. By specifying the mediating mechanisms of existing interventions one can improve future physical activity interventions. This study explored potential mediators of the long-term effect of the school-based multicomponent JUMP-in intervention on sport participation, outdoor play and screen time in Dutch primary schoolchildren from disadvantaged neighborhoods. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 75% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 281 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 276 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 54 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 12% |
| Researcher | 30 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 46 | 16% |
| Unknown | 72 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 38 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 31 | 11% |
| Sports and Recreations | 29 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 10% |
| Other | 28 | 10% |
| Unknown | 94 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2021.
All research outputs
#5,618,440
of 22,685,926 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#1,389
of 1,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,139
of 183,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#17
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,685,926 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,919 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.4. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,491 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.