You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
PhenoPhyte: a flexible affordable method to quantify 2D phenotypes from imagery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1746-4811-8-45 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jason M Green, Heidi Appel, Erin MacNeal Rehrig, Jaturon Harnsomburana, Jia-Fu Chang, Peter Balint-Kurti, Chi-Ren Shyu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
| Colombia | 1 | 25% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Argentina | 2 | 1% |
| Belgium | 2 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 150 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 41 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 19% |
| Unknown | 16 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 94 | 58% |
| Computer Science | 13 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 5% |
| Engineering | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Unknown | 21 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2013.
All research outputs
#13,012,121
of 22,685,926 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#586
of 1,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,078
of 183,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,685,926 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.