↓ Skip to main content

Authors’ response to “Evaluation of Treatments for HIV-Associated Kaposi Sarcoma in Africa”

Overview of attention for article published in Infectious Agents and Cancer, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Authors’ response to “Evaluation of Treatments for HIV-Associated Kaposi Sarcoma in Africa”
Published in
Infectious Agents and Cancer, May 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13027-021-00372-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew E. Coldiron, Ana Gabriela Gutierrez Zamudio, Rolanda Manuel, Iza Ciglenecki, Laurence Toutous Trellu, Lucas Molfino

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2021.
All research outputs
#4,644,840
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Infectious Agents and Cancer
#71
of 534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,857
of 439,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infectious Agents and Cancer
#5
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 534 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.