↓ Skip to main content

Whole-body vibration training versus conventional balance training in patients with severe COPD—a randomized, controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Respiratory Research, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Whole-body vibration training versus conventional balance training in patients with severe COPD—a randomized, controlled trial
Published in
Respiratory Research, May 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12931-021-01688-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rainer Gloeckl, Tessa Schneeberger, Daniela Leitl, Tobias Reinold, Christoph Nell, Inga Jarosch, Klaus Kenn, Andreas R. Koczulla

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 134 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 16 12%
Student > Master 11 8%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 5%
Researcher 5 4%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 67 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 20 15%
Unspecified 16 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 8%
Sports and Recreations 8 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 <1%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 70 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2021.
All research outputs
#4,224,802
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#534
of 3,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,399
of 454,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#22
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,064 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.