You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The use of Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) to address causality in complex systems: a systematic review of research on public health interventions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-021-10926-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Benjamin Hanckel, Mark Petticrew, James Thomas, Judith Green |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 17 | 38% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Philippines | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 20 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 49% |
| Scientists | 18 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 169 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 13% |
| Researcher | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 28 | 17% |
| Unknown | 81 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 22 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 7 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 24 | 14% |
| Unknown | 91 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,109,402
of 24,701,594 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,212
of 16,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,373
of 433,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#43
of 428 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,701,594 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,353 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 428 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.