↓ Skip to main content

Repurposing existing medications for coronavirus disease 2019: protocol for a rapid and living systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Repurposing existing medications for coronavirus disease 2019: protocol for a rapid and living systematic review
Published in
Systematic Reviews, May 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13643-021-01693-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Benjamin P. Geisler, Lara Zahabi, Adam Edward Lang, Naomi Eastwood, Elaine Tennant, Ljiljana Lukic, Elad Sharon, Hai-Hua Chuang, Chang-Berm Kang, Knakita Clayton-Johnson, Ahmed Aljaberi, Haining Yu, Chinh Bui, Tuan Le Mau, Wen-Cheng Li, Debbie Teodorescu, Ludwig Christian Hinske, Dennis L. Sun, Farrin A. Manian, Adam G. Dunn

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Librarian 2 5%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 2%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 27 61%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 26 59%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,555,845
of 19,188,609 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#518
of 1,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,577
of 336,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,188,609 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,715 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them