You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cryopreservation of human cancers conserves tumour heterogeneity for single-cell multi-omics analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Medicine, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13073-021-00885-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sunny Z. Wu, Daniel L. Roden, Ghamdan Al-Eryani, Nenad Bartonicek, Kate Harvey, Aurélie S. Cazet, Chia-Ling Chan, Simon Junankar, Mun N. Hui, Ewan A. Millar, Julia Beretov, Lisa Horvath, Anthony M. Joshua, Phillip Stricker, James S. Wilmott, Camelia Quek, Georgina V. Long, Richard A. Scolyer, Bertrand Z. Yeung, Davendra Segara, Cindy Mak, Sanjay Warrier, Joseph E. Powell, Sandra O’Toole, Elgene Lim, Alexander Swarbrick |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 19 | 37% |
| United States | 8 | 16% |
| Hong Kong | 2 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 2% |
| Thailand | 1 | 2% |
| Singapore | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 12 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 51% |
| Scientists | 21 | 41% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 77 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 28 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 25 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 30 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,209,301
of 24,046,191 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#246
of 1,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,303
of 430,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#8
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,046,191 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.