You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Non-invasive and minimally invasive glucose monitoring devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis on diagnostic accuracy of hypoglycaemia detection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-021-01644-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicole Lindner, Aya Kuwabara, Tim Holt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 21% |
| Slovenia | 1 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| South Africa | 1 | 7% |
| Germany | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 86% |
| Scientists | 2 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 79 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
| Researcher | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 18% |
| Unknown | 38 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 11 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 43 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,351,234
of 25,483,400 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#198
of 2,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,481
of 454,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#10
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,483,400 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,237 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.