↓ Skip to main content

Real-time ultrasound-guided percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: a feasibility study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
119 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Real-time ultrasound-guided percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: a feasibility study
Published in
Critical Care, February 2011
DOI 10.1186/cc10047
Pubmed ID
Authors

Venkatakrishna Rajajee, Jeffrey J Fletcher, Lauryn R Rochlen, Teresa L Jacobs

Abstract

Ultrasound (US) performed prior to percutaneous tracheostomy (PT) may be useful in avoiding injury to pretracheal vascular structures and in avoiding high placement of the tube. Bedside real-time US guidance with visualization of needle path is routinely utilized for other procedures such as central venous catheterization, and may enhance the safety and accuracy of PT without causing airway occlusion or hypercarbia. Our objective was to demonstrate that PT performed under real-time US guidance with visualization of needle path during tracheal puncture is feasible, including in patients with features that increase the technical difficulty of PT.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
Colombia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 137 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 17%
Other 17 12%
Student > Postgraduate 16 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Other 35 24%
Unknown 31 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 86 59%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Engineering 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 33 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2012.
All research outputs
#16,048,318
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#5,211
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,787
of 119,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#69
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.