You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Precision medicine and the principle of equal treatment: a conjoint analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, May 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12910-021-00625-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Eirik Joakim Tranvåg, Roger Strand, Trygve Ottersen, Ole Frithjof Norheim |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
Norway | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 4 | 67% |
Members of the public | 1 | 17% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
Professor | 2 | 7% |
Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 12 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 23% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 13% |
Unknown | 12 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2021.
All research outputs
#7,849,062
of 24,333,504 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#648
of 1,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,077
of 431,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#29
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,333,504 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,045 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.