You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
“A coalition of the willing”: experiences of co-designing an online pain management programme (iSelf-help) for people with persistent pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Research Involvement and Engagement, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40900-021-00275-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hemakumar Devan, Meredith A. Perry, Mostafa Yaghoubi, Leigh Hale |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 4 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
| Scientists | 3 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 18% |
| Researcher | 5 | 10% |
| Professor | 4 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 20 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 22% |
| Psychology | 5 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 18 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2021.
All research outputs
#4,356,616
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Research Involvement and Engagement
#283
of 408 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,284
of 441,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Involvement and Engagement
#15
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 408 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,891 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.