You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging with conventional MR imaging for differentiating complex solid and cystic ovarian tumors at 1.5T
|
---|---|
Published in |
World Journal of Surgical Oncology, November 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1477-7819-10-237 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ping Zhang, Yanfen Cui, Wenhua Li, Gang Ren, Caiting Chu, Xiangru Wu |
Abstract |
Preoperative characterization of complex solid and cystic adnexal masses is crucial for informing patients about possible surgical strategies. Our study aims to determine the usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) for characterizing complex solid and cystic adnexal masses. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 67% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 4 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 10% |
Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
Lecturer | 2 | 7% |
Other | 5 | 17% |
Unknown | 9 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 41% |
Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 3% |
Psychology | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 13 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2020.
All research outputs
#14,155,634
of 22,685,926 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#437
of 2,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,070
of 182,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#12
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,685,926 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,039 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.