↓ Skip to main content

Correction to: Restoration of bilateral motor coordination from preserved agonist-antagonist coupling in amputation musculature

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correction to: Restoration of bilateral motor coordination from preserved agonist-antagonist coupling in amputation musculature
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, May 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12984-021-00846-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tony Shu, Shan Shan Huang, Christopher Shallal, Hugh M. Herr

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2021.
All research outputs
#18,807,229
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#1,008
of 1,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#320,745
of 440,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#35
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,940 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.