You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Measuring psychological pain: psychometric analysis of the Orbach and Mikulincer Mental Pain Scale
Measurement Instruments for the Social Sciences, May 2021
Madeline P. Casanova, Megan C. Nelson, Michael A. Pickering, Karen M. Appleby, Emma J. Grindley, Lindsay W. Larkins, Russell T. Baker
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||7||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||3||27%|
|Lecturer > Senior Lecturer||1||9%|
|Student > Master||1||9%|
|Professor > Associate Professor||1||9%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||2||18%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||1||9%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||1||9%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2021.
All research outputs
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Measurement Instruments for the Social Sciences
of 29 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 443,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Measurement Instruments for the Social Sciences
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one scored the same or higher as 24 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them