↓ Skip to main content

Conducting invasive urodynamics in primary care: qualitative interview study examining experiences of patients and healthcare professionals

Overview of attention for article published in Diagnostic and Prognostic Research, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 113)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Conducting invasive urodynamics in primary care: qualitative interview study examining experiences of patients and healthcare professionals
Published in
Diagnostic and Prognostic Research, May 2021
DOI 10.1186/s41512-021-00100-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Milosevic, Natalie Joseph-Williams, Bethan Pell, Elizabeth Cain, Robyn Hackett, Ffion Murdoch, Haroon Ahmed, A. Joy Allen, Alison Bray, Samantha Clarke, Marcus J. Drake, Michael Drinnan, Kerenza Hood, Tom Schatzberger, Yemisi Takwoingi, Emma Thomas-Jones, Raymond White, Adrian Edwards, Chris Harding

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 14%
Student > Postgraduate 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Unknown 4 57%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 14%
Unknown 5 71%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2021.
All research outputs
#2,103,635
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Diagnostic and Prognostic Research
#23
of 113 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,537
of 444,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diagnostic and Prognostic Research
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 113 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them