↓ Skip to main content

Correction to: The impact of novel and traditional food bank approaches on food insecurity: a longitudinal study in Ottawa, Canada

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correction to: The impact of novel and traditional food bank approaches on food insecurity: a longitudinal study in Ottawa, Canada
Published in
BMC Public Health, May 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12889-021-10981-9
Authors

Anita Rizvi, Rania Wasfi, Aganeta Enns, Elizabeth Kristjansson

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Other 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 6 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 3 19%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 6 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2021.
All research outputs
#5,288,263
of 21,223,235 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,323
of 13,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,742
of 345,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,223,235 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,749 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them