↓ Skip to main content

Youth’s narratives about family members smoking: parenting the parent- it’s not fair!

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Youth’s narratives about family members smoking: parenting the parent- it’s not fair!
Published in
BMC Public Health, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-965
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roberta L Woodgate, Christine M Kreklewetz

Abstract

Successful cancer prevention policies and programming for youth must be based on a solid understanding of youth's conceptualization of cancer and cancer prevention. Accordingly, a qualitative study examining youth's perspectives of cancer and its prevention was undertaken. Not surprisingly, smoking (i.e., tobacco cigarette smoking) was one of the dominant lines of discourse in the youth's narratives. This paper reports findings of how youth conceptualize smoking with attention to their perspectives on parental and family-related smoking issues and experiences.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 3%
Hungary 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 94 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 19%
Researcher 17 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 22 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 21 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 14%
Social Sciences 10 10%
Environmental Science 4 4%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 28 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2016.
All research outputs
#1,846,514
of 15,555,703 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,213
of 10,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,396
of 152,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#133
of 1,038 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,555,703 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,726 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,038 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.