You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Burden of paediatric influenza in Western Europe: a systematic review
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, November 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-968 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Evgeniya N Antonova, Catherine E Rycroft, Christopher S Ambrose, Terho Heikkinen, Nicola Principi |
Abstract |
Influenza illness in children causes significant clinical and economic burden. Although some European countries have adopted influenza immunisation policies for healthy children, the debate about paediatric influenza vaccination in most countries of the European Union is ongoing. Our aim was to summarise influenza burden (in terms of health outcomes and economic burden) in children in Western Europe via a systematic literature review. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 5 | 33% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
United States | 2 | 13% |
Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 53% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 27% |
Scientists | 2 | 13% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 133 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 15% |
Student > Master | 20 | 15% |
Researcher | 18 | 13% |
Other | 13 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
Other | 22 | 16% |
Unknown | 31 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 32% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
Other | 27 | 20% |
Unknown | 36 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2019.
All research outputs
#3,760,361
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#4,062
of 15,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,688
of 181,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#61
of 278 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,466 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,700 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 278 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.