↓ Skip to main content

Using administrative health data to describe colorectal and lung cancer care in New South Wales, Australia: a validation study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using administrative health data to describe colorectal and lung cancer care in New South Wales, Australia: a validation study
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-12-387
Pubmed ID
Authors

David E Goldsbury, Katie Armstrong, Leonardo Simonella, Bruce K Armstrong, Dianne L O’Connell

Abstract

Monitoring treatment patterns is crucial to improving cancer patient care. Our aim was to determine the accuracy of linked routinely collected administrative health data for monitoring colorectal and lung cancer care in New South Wales (NSW), Australia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Italy 1 3%
Unknown 36 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 18%
Student > Bachelor 6 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Other 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 10 26%
Unknown 5 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Computer Science 2 5%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 7 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2012.
All research outputs
#13,371,661
of 22,685,926 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#4,597
of 7,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,891
of 182,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#71
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,685,926 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,583 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.