Title |
Study protocol for the Integra Initiative to assess the benefits and costs of integrating sexual and reproductive health and HIV services in Kenya and Swaziland
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, November 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-973 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Charlotte E Warren, Susannah H Mayhew, Anna Vassall, James Kelly Kimani, Kathryn Church, Carol Dayo Obure, Natalie Friend du-Preez, Timothy Abuya, Richard Mutemwa, Manuela Colombini, Isolde Birdthistle, Ian Askew, Charlotte Watts |
Abstract |
In sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) there are strong arguments for the provision of integrated sexual and reproductive health (SRH) and HIV services. Most HIV transmissions are sexually transmitted or associated with pregnancy, childbirth, and breastfeeding. Many of the behaviours that prevent HIV transmission also prevent sexually transmitted infections and unintended pregnancies. There is potential for integration to increase the coverage of HIV services, as individuals who use SRH services can benefit from HIV services and vice-versa, as well as increase cost-savings. However, there is a dearth of empirical evidence on effective models for integrating HIV/SRH services. The need for robust evidence led a consortium of three organizations - International Planned Parenthood Federation, Population Council and the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine - to design/implement the Integra Initiative. Integra seeks to generate rigorous evidence on the feasibility, effectiveness, cost and impact of different models for delivering integrated HIV/SRH services in high and medium HIV prevalence settings in SSA. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 40% |
Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 243 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 56 | 23% |
Researcher | 45 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 6% |
Other | 40 | 16% |
Unknown | 49 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 23% |
Social Sciences | 48 | 19% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 13% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 13 | 5% |
Psychology | 7 | 3% |
Other | 33 | 13% |
Unknown | 56 | 23% |