↓ Skip to main content

EDLm6APred: ensemble deep learning approach for mRNA m6A site prediction

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
EDLm6APred: ensemble deep learning approach for mRNA m6A site prediction
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, May 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12859-021-04206-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lin Zhang, Gangshen Li, Xiuyu Li, Honglei Wang, Shutao Chen, Hui Liu

Abstract

As a common and abundant RNA methylation modification, N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is widely spread in various species' transcriptomes, and it is closely related to the occurrence and development of various life processes and diseases. Thus, accurate identification of m6A methylation sites has become a hot topic. Most biological methods rely on high-throughput sequencing technology, which places great demands on the sequencing library preparation and data analysis. Thus, various machine learning methods have been proposed to extract various types of features based on sequences, then occupied conventional classifiers, such as SVM, RF, etc., for m6A methylation site identification. However, the identification performance relies heavily on the extracted features, which still need to be improved. This paper mainly studies feature extraction and classification of m6A methylation sites in a natural language processing way, which manages to organically integrate the feature extraction and classification simultaneously, with consideration of upstream and downstream information of m6A sites. One-hot, RNA word embedding, and Word2vec are adopted to depict sites from the perspectives of the base as well as its upstream and downstream sequence. The BiLSTM model, a well-known sequence model, was then constructed to discriminate the sequences with potential m6A sites. Since the above-mentioned three feature extraction methods focus on different perspectives of m6A sites, an ensemble deep learning predictor (EDLm6APred) was finally constructed for m6A site prediction. Experimental results on human and mouse data sets show that EDLm6APred outperforms the other single ones, indicating that base, upstream, and downstream information are all essential for m6A site detection. Compared with the existing m6A methylation site prediction models without genomic features, EDLm6APred obtains 86.6% of the area under receiver operating curve on the human data sets, indicating the effectiveness of sequential modeling on RNA. To maximize user convenience, a webserver was developed as an implementation of EDLm6APred and made publicly available at www.xjtlu.edu.cn/biologicalsciences/EDLm6APred . Our proposed EDLm6APred method is a reliable predictor for m6A methylation sites.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Professor 1 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 7 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 3 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Neuroscience 1 7%
Computer Science 1 7%
Unknown 8 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2021.
All research outputs
#14,287,221
of 23,344,526 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#4,575
of 7,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,846
of 448,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#142
of 177 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,344,526 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 177 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.