↓ Skip to main content

More than a method: trusting relationships, productive tensions, and two-way learning as mechanisms of authentic co-production

Overview of attention for article published in Research Involvement and Engagement, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 513)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
176 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
More than a method: trusting relationships, productive tensions, and two-way learning as mechanisms of authentic co-production
Published in
Research Involvement and Engagement, May 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40900-021-00262-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah E. Knowles, Dawn Allen, Ailsa Donnelly, Jackie Flynn, Kay Gallacher, Annmarie Lewis, Grace McCorkle, Manoj Mistry, Pat Walkington, Jess Drinkwater

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 176 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 87 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 16%
Researcher 14 16%
Student > Master 10 11%
Other 7 8%
Lecturer 4 5%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 29 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 14%
Social Sciences 12 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 5%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 35 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 123. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#340,394
of 25,470,300 outputs
Outputs from Research Involvement and Engagement
#8
of 513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,664
of 459,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Involvement and Engagement
#1
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,470,300 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.