You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Assessing public perception of a sand fly biting study on the pathway to a controlled human infection model for cutaneous leishmaniasis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Research Involvement and Engagement, May 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40900-021-00277-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Vivak Parkash, Georgina Jones, Nina Martin, Morgan Steigmann, Elizabeth Greensted, Paul Kaye, Alison M. Layton, Charles J. Lacey |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 40% |
Unknown | 6 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 90% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 29% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 29% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 14% |
Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 7% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 2 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 14% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 14% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 14% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 21% |
Unknown | 3 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2023.
All research outputs
#6,221,075
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Research Involvement and Engagement
#344
of 452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,032
of 437,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Involvement and Engagement
#21
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 452 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.