You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Augmented efficacy of intermittent theta burst stimulation on the virtual reality-based cycling training for upper limb function in patients with stroke: a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12984-021-00885-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yu-Hsin Chen, Chia-Ling Chen, Ying-Zu Huang, Hsieh-Ching Chen, Chung-Yao Chen, Ching-Yi Wu, Keh-chung Lin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 145 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 5% |
| Researcher | 6 | 4% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 13% |
| Unknown | 87 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 3% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 14% |
| Unknown | 85 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2023.
All research outputs
#7,538,936
of 24,266,964 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#472
of 1,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,619
of 436,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#16
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,266,964 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,351 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.