You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical effectiveness of the sequential 4-channel NMES compared with that of the conventional 2-channel NMES for the treatment of dysphagia in a prospective double-blind randomized controlled study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12984-021-00884-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kyoung-Ho Seo, Joonyoung Jang, Eun Gyeong Jang, Yulhyun Park, So Young Lee, Bo Ryun Kim, Donghwi Park, Sungwon Park, Hyeoncheol Hwang, Nam Hun Kim, Byung-Mo Oh, Han Gil Seo, Jun Chang Lee, Ju Seok Ryu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 33% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 6% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 4% |
| Researcher | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 32 | 62% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Psychology | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 32 | 62% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2021.
All research outputs
#13,571,557
of 24,067,703 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#614
of 1,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,500
of 435,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#25
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,067,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.