You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Models of reablement evaluation (MoRE): a study protocol of a quasi-experimental mixed methods evaluation of reablement services in England
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12913-016-1600-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rachel Mann, Bryony Beresford, Gillian Parker, Parvaneh Rabiee, Helen Weatherly, Rita Faria, Mona Kanaan, Alison Laver-Fawcett, Gerald Pilkington, Fiona Aspinal |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 65 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 15% |
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Librarian | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 17 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Unknown | 19 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2018.
All research outputs
#23,391,126
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#8,234
of 8,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#334,715
of 375,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#222
of 243 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,804 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,868 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 243 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.