You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evaluating implementation of the Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) guidelines: the TRUST process for rating journal policies, procedures, and practices
|
---|---|
Published in |
Research Integrity and Peer Review, June 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s41073-021-00112-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Evan Mayo-Wilson, Sean Grant, Lauren Supplee, Sina Kianersi, Afsah Amin, Alex DeHaven, David Mellor |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 2 | 8% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
United States | 2 | 8% |
Canada | 1 | 4% |
Portugal | 1 | 4% |
Colombia | 1 | 4% |
Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
France | 1 | 4% |
Hong Kong | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 14 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 16 | 62% |
Scientists | 6 | 23% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 20% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
Librarian | 1 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 2 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 13% |
Psychology | 1 | 7% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,488,088
of 24,810,360 outputs
Outputs from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#95
of 129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,786
of 438,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,810,360 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 129 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.8. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,922 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.