↓ Skip to main content

Mapathons versus automated feature extraction: a comparative analysis for strengthening immunization microplanning

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Health Geographics, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mapathons versus automated feature extraction: a comparative analysis for strengthening immunization microplanning
Published in
International Journal of Health Geographics, June 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12942-021-00277-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amalia Mendes, Tess Palmer, Andrew Berens, Julie Espey, Rhiannan Price, Apoorva Mallya, Sidney Brown, Maureen Martinez, Noha Farag, Brian Kaplan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 20%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Unspecified 2 5%
Professor 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 20 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 3 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 8%
Engineering 3 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Unspecified 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 22 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2023.
All research outputs
#7,117,202
of 24,733,536 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Health Geographics
#230
of 646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,563
of 438,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Health Geographics
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,733,536 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.