You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A randomized controlled trial of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine, artesunate-mefloquine and extended artemether-lumefantrine treatments for malaria in pregnancy on the Thailand-Myanmar border
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medicine, June 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12916-021-02002-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Makoto Saito, Verena I. Carrara, Mary Ellen Gilder, Aung Myat Min, Nay Win Tun, Mupawjay Pimanpanarak, Jacher Viladpai-nguen, Moo Kho Paw, Warat Haohankhunnatham, Kamonchanok Konghahong, Aung Pyae Phyo, Cindy Chu, Claudia Turner, Sue J. Lee, Jureeporn Duanguppama, Mallika Imwong, Germana Bancone, Stephane Proux, Pratap Singhasivanon, Nicholas J. White, François Nosten, Rose McGready |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 22% |
United States | 2 | 9% |
Malaysia | 1 | 4% |
Jordan | 1 | 4% |
Thailand | 1 | 4% |
Cambodia | 1 | 4% |
Italy | 1 | 4% |
Chile | 1 | 4% |
Australia | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 15 | 65% |
Scientists | 6 | 26% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 87 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 10 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
Other | 11 | 13% |
Unknown | 41 | 47% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 7% |
Design | 5 | 6% |
Unspecified | 5 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
Other | 14 | 16% |
Unknown | 42 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2021.
All research outputs
#2,208,319
of 23,527,856 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,457
of 3,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,495
of 448,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#28
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,527,856 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,557 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,261 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.