↓ Skip to main content

Copy Number Variation detection from 1000 Genomes project exon capture sequencing data

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Copy Number Variation detection from 1000 Genomes project exon capture sequencing data
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-13-305
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiantao Wu, Krzysztof R Grzeda, Chip Stewart, Fabian Grubert, Alexander E Urban, Michael P Snyder, Gabor T Marth

Abstract

DNA capture technologies combined with high-throughput sequencing now enable cost-effective, deep-coverage, targeted sequencing of complete exomes. This is well suited for SNP discovery and genotyping. However there has been little attention devoted to Copy Number Variation (CNV) detection from exome capture datasets despite the potentially high impact of CNVs in exonic regions on protein function.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Brazil 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 120 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 48 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 23%
Student > Master 11 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 7%
Other 7 5%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 9 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 67 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 24%
Computer Science 9 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 4%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 12 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2021.
All research outputs
#4,219,542
of 25,502,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#1,421
of 7,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,490
of 284,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#20
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,502,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,712 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.