You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impact of sociodemographic factors on the consumption of tubers in Brazil
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12937-021-00709-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Justyna Horodyska, Sandrine Pigat, Jasmin Wonik, Foteini Bompola, David Cai, Colin D. Rehm, Tanhia D. Gonzalez |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 3 | 60% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Belgium | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 3 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 12% |
| Unknown | 8 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 2 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 12% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 12% |
| Unknown | 8 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2022.
All research outputs
#7,019,341
of 23,269,984 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#894
of 1,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,236
of 447,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#13
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,269,984 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.