↓ Skip to main content

Strategies for assessing the impact of loss to follow-up on estimates of neurodevelopmental impairment in a very preterm cohort at 2 years of age

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Strategies for assessing the impact of loss to follow-up on estimates of neurodevelopmental impairment in a very preterm cohort at 2 years of age
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, June 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12874-021-01264-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aurélie Piedvache, Stef van Buuren, Henrique Barros, Ana Isabel Ribeiro, Elizabeth Draper, Jennifer Zeitlin, E. Martens, G. Martens, P. Van Reempts, K. Boerch, A. Hasselager, L. D. Huusom, O. Pryds, T. Weber, L. Toome, H. Varendi, Ile-de France, P. Y. Ancel, B. Blondel, A. Burguet, P. H. Jarreau, P. Truffert, R. F. Maier, B. Misselwitz, S. Schmidt, L. Gortner, D. Baronciani, G. Gargano, R. Agostino, D. DiLallo, F. Franco, V. Carnielli, C. Koopman-Esseboom, A. van Heijst, J. Nijman, J. Gadzinowski, J. Mazela, L. M. Graça, M. C. Machado, Carina Rodrigues, T. Rodrigues, A. K. Bonamy, M. Norman, E. Wilson E Boyle, E. S. Draper, B. N. Manktelow, A. C. Fenton, D. W. A. Milligan, J. Zeitlin, M. Bonet, A. Piedvache

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Researcher 2 12%
Student > Master 2 12%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 24%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Mathematics 1 6%
Sports and Recreations 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 8 47%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2021.
All research outputs
#18,968,999
of 21,321,681 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,771
of 1,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#281,816
of 345,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,321,681 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them