↓ Skip to main content

Dealing with predatory journal articles captured in systematic reviews

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
90 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dealing with predatory journal articles captured in systematic reviews
Published in
Systematic Reviews, June 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13643-021-01733-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Danielle B. Rice, Becky Skidmore, Kelly D. Cobey

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 90 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 12 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 3 5%
Researcher 3 5%
Other 15 25%
Unknown 18 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 17%
Social Sciences 6 10%
Computer Science 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Environmental Science 3 5%
Other 13 22%
Unknown 20 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2024.
All research outputs
#675,373
of 25,826,146 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#75
of 2,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,180
of 461,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#1
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,826,146 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,258 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.