You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A new growth chart for preterm babies: Babson and Benda's chart updated with recent data and a new format
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Pediatrics, December 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2431-3-13 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tanis R Fenton |
| Abstract |
The Babson and Benda 1976 "fetal-infant growth graph" for preterm infants is commonly used in neonatal intensive care. Its limits include the small sample size which provides low confidence in the extremes of the data, the 26 weeks start and the 500 gram graph increments. The purpose of this study was to develop an updated growth chart beginning at 22 weeks based on a meta-analysis of published reference studies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 3 | 60% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 426 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 407 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 60 | 14% |
| Other | 52 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 43 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 39 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 9% |
| Other | 117 | 27% |
| Unknown | 77 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 216 | 51% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 3% |
| Engineering | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 45 | 11% |
| Unknown | 88 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2015.
All research outputs
#1,648,255
of 22,685,926 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#189
of 2,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,498
of 131,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,685,926 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,984 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them